Taiwan stock checkup — the result of running a checklist, not a grade
The standard misreading of a checkup page is to read a row of passes and fails as “is this company healthy”. This page deliberately refuses to collapse a checklist into a verdict on the company. A checkup is the result of running a checklist: which items are in it and where each threshold sits determine how many items pass. The checklist was written by someone and the thresholds were chosen by someone, so a different set produces a different answer. What deserves scrutiny is therefore not the pass count but what the checklist asks and what it never asks. We expose every condition, threshold and input field so you can disagree with any single item, instead of asking you to accept a total.
What the fields are, and how each item is judged
Each item returns its name, test condition, threshold, the statement fields it reads, the period and the as-of date, plus a three-state outcome: pass, fail or insufficient data. The third state is deliberate — missing data is not a failure, and merging the two would make the checkup look more decisive than it is.
Every item can be inspected and rejected on its own. Agreeing with seven items and rejecting three is a normal way to use this page; collapsing ten items into one number is precisely what removes your ability to argue.
Different thresholds, different verdict
For the same company, looser thresholds pass more items and tighter ones pass fewer. Neither setting is truer — one simply has its assumptions written down. So this page does not offer the correct checkup; it offers one disclosed threshold set and the result it implies.
When comparing two checkup reports, compare the checklists and thresholds before the conclusions. Reports built on different checklists are not comparable: the company did not change, the questions did.
No score and no verdict on quality
We publish no total score, no A/B/C grade and no health ranking. The trouble with a score is that it hides the weights: how many points each item carries and why is rarely explained, yet those weights are where the conclusion actually comes from.
Sentences such as "the fundamentals are good so you can buy" or "a full checkup score means it is safe" will never appear here, because a checklist cannot support them. All a checklist can say is which conditions held and which did not.
What this page must not be used for
No ranking, no screening, no price targets, no entry or exit timing. A high pass count does not mean the price will rise, and a low one does not mean it will fall: the checklist tests published financial and market facts, not future prices.
The right use is as a starting question: which items failed, did they fail because of the business or because of the threshold, is that threshold reasonable for this industry, and what exactly is missing on the insufficient-data rows? The answers live in the original statements.